Mastering Agile Estimation with the Fibonacci Sequence for Superior Story Points

Using the Fibonacci sequence to assign story points during agile estimation leads to more accurate sizing of user stories. This article explains how and why the Fibonacci scale works so well for agile teams to estimate their work.

What is the Fibonacci Sequence and How is it Used in Agile Estimation?

The Fibonacci sequence is a series of numbers where each number is the sum of the previous two numbers, starting with 0 and 1. This creates the exponential number sequence: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55 etc.

In agile estimation, a modified version of the Fibonacci sequence is commonly used to size user stories and estimate the relative effort required to complete them. Typical modified Fibonacci scales used include 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 20, 40 and 100.

Using a Fibonacci scale provides several key benefits for agile estimation:

  • It accounts for the exponential increase in difficulty and effort associated with larger and more complex user stories

  • The gaps between the Fibonacci numbers get wider as the numbers increase, reflecting the greater uncertainty inherent in larger estimates

  • The relative sizing feels more natural and intuitive for agile teams estimating story points

Overall, the modified Fibonacci scale maps closely to the typical variability seen in agile story point estimation, with small enhancements clustered nearer the bottom and larger efforts towards the top.

Why Use Story Points Instead of Hours for Agile Estimation?

Story points represent the overall effort and complexity required to complete a user story. They purposefully remain an abstract unit instead of estimating in hours. This allows agile teams to estimate stories relative to each other without getting bogged down in detailed hour estimate predictions.

Some of the main benefits of using story points over hours for estimation include:

  • Not coupling estimates directly to hours makes them more accurate across varying team velocities and sprint durations

  • Story points better incorporate unknowns, unplanned work and complexity

  • Less prone to unintended padding or sandbagging of hour estimates

  • Focuses the team on story prioritization over false precision

By capturing the overall effort needed to complete each story, story points lead to better release planning and forecasting by agile teams. Detailed task hour estimation is still done later in the sprint planning process.

How Are Story Points Estimated Using the Fibonacci Scale?

During sprint planning, agile teams play planning poker to estimate story points. Each team member selects a number from the Fibonacci scale that reflects their assessment of the overall effort and complexity needed to complete the user story or product backlog item being discussed.

Once everyone has made their selection based on the relative sizing and risk, all team member selections are revealed at the same time. Any differences in the story point assessments are then discussed to understand the rationale and characteristics missed by some team members.

Through this estimation process and discussion, a final story point value is agreed upon for the story utilizing team consensus. If a story is too broad or complex to complete in a single sprint, the agile team will further break it down into smaller, more manageable pieces with individual estimates.

What Does Each Story Point Number Represent?

While the specific meaning of each Fibonacci story point number differs somewhat between agile teams and projects, some general principles and guidelines do apply:

  • 1 to 3 points usually signifies a small user story that is an enhancement type of change, bug fix or otherwise represents relatively low effort

  • 5 points is generally used for an isolated user story of moderate scope that delivers value for the customer

  • 8 points represents a more significant feature or structural change spanning various parts of the product that has some inherent complexity, risk factors or dependencies

  • 13+ points are typically used for very large user stories where the effort is expected to span an entire sprint or longer, involves significant unknowns or touches multiple interconnected parts of the system

As the story point number and corresponding spot on the Fibonacci scale increases, it signals progressively increasing effort, uncertainty and overall risk associated with the completion of that story. This helps inform estimation and planning.

How Is Velocity Tracked with Story Points to Improve Planning?

A key agile estimation practice is tracking the number of story points the team completes within each sprint through the working software delivered. This determines their velocity or work capacity which is used to forecast how much the team can likely deliver in future sprints.

Velocity needs to be measured over multiple sprints for it to provide reliable predictive insights. Since it will depend greatly on the size, experience, tools and evolving skills of specific agile teams, velocity should be tracked separately for each team. Comparing velocity across teams is less meaningful than observing velocity trends over time for a given team.

By tracking story point velocity trends over multiple iterations, agile estimation and planning activities improve greatly along with more predictable forecasting of upcoming work.

How Does Using Story Points Foster Better Planning and Prioritization?

The process of assigning story points using the Fibonacci scale requires engaged discussion, questions and clarifications so that the agile team builds shared understanding. Every team member provides their estimate so unshared assumptions, unknown gaps or blindspots in understanding are revealed.

Discussing each user story or product backlog item in detail fosters better appreciation of its size, complexity, associated risk, dependencies with other parts of the system, and overall business value. This builds collective knowledge and understanding throughout the team.

With clearer comprehension of key story details, the efficiency and accuracy of release planning and sprint planning is enhanced dramatically. In a similar way, story point estimation aids continuous product backlog grooming and prioritization.

What is a Typical Agile Estimation Process Using Story Points?

While variations certainly exist across teams and frameworks like Scrum or Kanban, here is a typical high-level flow for leveraging story points and the Fibonacci scale in agile estimation:

  • Backlog Grooming: The product owner clarifies, elaborates and decomposes stories in preparation for the backlog estimation. Acceptance criteria is defined.

  • Estimation & Planning: The full development team plays planning poker to size each story and agree on story point assessments via team consensus. 

  • Velocity Tracking: Team velocity based on completed story points is tracked over multiple sprints to forecast team capability.

  • Ongoing Backlog Refinement: Agile estimation is an ongoing process, with new stories continuously refined and points updated based on evolving understanding.

How Does the Fibonacci Scale Improve Estimation Ranges?

The Fibonacci sequence exhibits exponential growth by design with each number being the sum of the previous two. This means that the gaps between the numbers increase exponentially as you move up the scale from smaller to larger numbers.

These exponentially expanding differences between the Fibonacci numbers provide a lot more latitude for larger estimates where greater variability naturally exists. Compare finding 7 different estimate options between a linear range of 1-10 versus the wider variability of an exponential range from 1-100.

This exponential range is far easier and more practical for distinguishing between finely-grained differences in small estimates while still providing wide estimate bands for larger efforts. This works very well for accurately capturing the nature of agile estimation variability.

When Would a Team Use a Modified Fibonacci Scale?

For some agile teams, extending the standard Fibonacci scale used for story point estimation makes sense for their projects or context.

As an example, including additional granularity with 0.5 as the first number after 0, allows more precision in sizing effort for very small enhancements and bug fixes.

At the other end of the spectrum, expanding the scale to 100 points helps capture some of the exceptionally large epics that arise despite attempts to decompose stories into sprint-size vertical slices of functionality.

Using a modified Fibonacci scale like: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 20, 40, 100 retains all the exponential benefits while improving range coverage at both ends of the estimation spectrum.

What are the Key Benefits of Using Fibonacci in Agile Estimation?

Here are some of the significant benefits and capability improvements that agile teams realize from incorporating a Fibonacci scale for story point estimation:

  • More Accurate Relative Sizing: The expanding gaps provide more precision where variability is lower while still accommodating uncertainty in larger items. Exponential range matches reality.

  • Reflects Increasing Complexity: Larger stories often involve more integration surfaces, technical unknowns, infrastructure needs etc. which increase complexity disproportionately. 

  • Encourages Discussion and Shared Understanding: Having to explain why you chose 13 vs. 8 or why you think it's a 3 forces important debate and awareness of subtle differences between stories.

  • Improves Release Forecasting: The historical velocity tracking (completed story points per sprint) feeds continuous release planning improvements as predictive ability increases sprint-over-sprint.

  • Shared Buy-In and Collaboration: Estimation builds connections between team members as everyone provides their perspective. Planning poker also helps eliminate groupthink based on hierarchy since reveal is simultaneous.

That summarizes the key reasons why the Fibonacci sequence works extremely well as the foundation for story point estimation on agile projects. The combination of exponential range and scalability along with continuous team discussion and improved visibility drives superior estimation.

Don't hesitate to comment below with any other questions!

Summary of Main Benefits

  • Fibonacci sequence uses exponential growth mapping to estimate variability

  • Typical scales used range from 0, 1, 2, 3 to 100 story points 

  • Abstract story points quantify effort and complexity, not time

  • Planning poker estimation fosters unshared assumption identification

  • Historical velocity in completed story points enables better forecasting

  • Exponential gaps provide high resolution at both estimation extremes

  • Expanded scales add precision with 0.5, 100 story points etc.

  • Increased visibility into subtleties of each story

  • Improved collaboration, trust and shared buy-in 

Mastering Agile Estimation with the Fibonacci Sequence for Superior Story Points

Using the Fibonacci sequence to assign story points during agile estimation leads to more accurate sizing of user stories. This article explains how and why the Fibonacci scale works so well for agile teams to estimate their work.

What is the Fibonacci Sequence and How is it Used in Agile Estimation?

The Fibonacci sequence is a series of numbers where each number is the sum of the previous two numbers, starting with 0 and 1. This creates the exponential number sequence: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55 etc.

In agile estimation, a modified version of the Fibonacci sequence is commonly used to size user stories and estimate the relative effort required to complete them. Typical modified Fibonacci scales used include 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 20, 40 and 100.

Using a Fibonacci scale provides several key benefits for agile estimation:

  • It accounts for the exponential increase in difficulty and effort associated with larger and more complex user stories

  • The gaps between the Fibonacci numbers get wider as the numbers increase, reflecting the greater uncertainty inherent in larger estimates

  • The relative sizing feels more natural and intuitive for agile teams estimating story points

Overall, the modified Fibonacci scale maps closely to the typical variability seen in agile story point estimation, with small enhancements clustered nearer the bottom and larger efforts towards the top.

Why Use Story Points Instead of Hours for Agile Estimation?

Story points represent the overall effort and complexity required to complete a user story. They purposefully remain an abstract unit instead of estimating in hours. This allows agile teams to estimate stories relative to each other without getting bogged down in detailed hour estimate predictions.

Some of the main benefits of using story points over hours for estimation include:

  • Not coupling estimates directly to hours makes them more accurate across varying team velocities and sprint durations

  • Story points better incorporate unknowns, unplanned work and complexity

  • Less prone to unintended padding or sandbagging of hour estimates

  • Focuses the team on story prioritization over false precision

By capturing the overall effort needed to complete each story, story points lead to better release planning and forecasting by agile teams. Detailed task hour estimation is still done later in the sprint planning process.

How Are Story Points Estimated Using the Fibonacci Scale?

During sprint planning, agile teams play planning poker to estimate story points. Each team member selects a number from the Fibonacci scale that reflects their assessment of the overall effort and complexity needed to complete the user story or product backlog item being discussed.

Once everyone has made their selection based on the relative sizing and risk, all team member selections are revealed at the same time. Any differences in the story point assessments are then discussed to understand the rationale and characteristics missed by some team members.

Through this estimation process and discussion, a final story point value is agreed upon for the story utilizing team consensus. If a story is too broad or complex to complete in a single sprint, the agile team will further break it down into smaller, more manageable pieces with individual estimates.

What Does Each Story Point Number Represent?

While the specific meaning of each Fibonacci story point number differs somewhat between agile teams and projects, some general principles and guidelines do apply:

  • 1 to 3 points usually signifies a small user story that is an enhancement type of change, bug fix or otherwise represents relatively low effort

  • 5 points is generally used for an isolated user story of moderate scope that delivers value for the customer

  • 8 points represents a more significant feature or structural change spanning various parts of the product that has some inherent complexity, risk factors or dependencies

  • 13+ points are typically used for very large user stories where the effort is expected to span an entire sprint or longer, involves significant unknowns or touches multiple interconnected parts of the system

As the story point number and corresponding spot on the Fibonacci scale increases, it signals progressively increasing effort, uncertainty and overall risk associated with the completion of that story. This helps inform estimation and planning.

How Is Velocity Tracked with Story Points to Improve Planning?

A key agile estimation practice is tracking the number of story points the team completes within each sprint through the working software delivered. This determines their velocity or work capacity which is used to forecast how much the team can likely deliver in future sprints.

Velocity needs to be measured over multiple sprints for it to provide reliable predictive insights. Since it will depend greatly on the size, experience, tools and evolving skills of specific agile teams, velocity should be tracked separately for each team. Comparing velocity across teams is less meaningful than observing velocity trends over time for a given team.

By tracking story point velocity trends over multiple iterations, agile estimation and planning activities improve greatly along with more predictable forecasting of upcoming work.

How Does Using Story Points Foster Better Planning and Prioritization?

The process of assigning story points using the Fibonacci scale requires engaged discussion, questions and clarifications so that the agile team builds shared understanding. Every team member provides their estimate so unshared assumptions, unknown gaps or blindspots in understanding are revealed.

Discussing each user story or product backlog item in detail fosters better appreciation of its size, complexity, associated risk, dependencies with other parts of the system, and overall business value. This builds collective knowledge and understanding throughout the team.

With clearer comprehension of key story details, the efficiency and accuracy of release planning and sprint planning is enhanced dramatically. In a similar way, story point estimation aids continuous product backlog grooming and prioritization.

What is a Typical Agile Estimation Process Using Story Points?

While variations certainly exist across teams and frameworks like Scrum or Kanban, here is a typical high-level flow for leveraging story points and the Fibonacci scale in agile estimation:

  • Backlog Grooming: The product owner clarifies, elaborates and decomposes stories in preparation for the backlog estimation. Acceptance criteria is defined.

  • Estimation & Planning: The full development team plays planning poker to size each story and agree on story point assessments via team consensus. 

  • Velocity Tracking: Team velocity based on completed story points is tracked over multiple sprints to forecast team capability.

  • Ongoing Backlog Refinement: Agile estimation is an ongoing process, with new stories continuously refined and points updated based on evolving understanding.

How Does the Fibonacci Scale Improve Estimation Ranges?

The Fibonacci sequence exhibits exponential growth by design with each number being the sum of the previous two. This means that the gaps between the numbers increase exponentially as you move up the scale from smaller to larger numbers.

These exponentially expanding differences between the Fibonacci numbers provide a lot more latitude for larger estimates where greater variability naturally exists. Compare finding 7 different estimate options between a linear range of 1-10 versus the wider variability of an exponential range from 1-100.

This exponential range is far easier and more practical for distinguishing between finely-grained differences in small estimates while still providing wide estimate bands for larger efforts. This works very well for accurately capturing the nature of agile estimation variability.

When Would a Team Use a Modified Fibonacci Scale?

For some agile teams, extending the standard Fibonacci scale used for story point estimation makes sense for their projects or context.

As an example, including additional granularity with 0.5 as the first number after 0, allows more precision in sizing effort for very small enhancements and bug fixes.

At the other end of the spectrum, expanding the scale to 100 points helps capture some of the exceptionally large epics that arise despite attempts to decompose stories into sprint-size vertical slices of functionality.

Using a modified Fibonacci scale like: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 20, 40, 100 retains all the exponential benefits while improving range coverage at both ends of the estimation spectrum.

What are the Key Benefits of Using Fibonacci in Agile Estimation?

Here are some of the significant benefits and capability improvements that agile teams realize from incorporating a Fibonacci scale for story point estimation:

  • More Accurate Relative Sizing: The expanding gaps provide more precision where variability is lower while still accommodating uncertainty in larger items. Exponential range matches reality.

  • Reflects Increasing Complexity: Larger stories often involve more integration surfaces, technical unknowns, infrastructure needs etc. which increase complexity disproportionately. 

  • Encourages Discussion and Shared Understanding: Having to explain why you chose 13 vs. 8 or why you think it's a 3 forces important debate and awareness of subtle differences between stories.

  • Improves Release Forecasting: The historical velocity tracking (completed story points per sprint) feeds continuous release planning improvements as predictive ability increases sprint-over-sprint.

  • Shared Buy-In and Collaboration: Estimation builds connections between team members as everyone provides their perspective. Planning poker also helps eliminate groupthink based on hierarchy since reveal is simultaneous.

That summarizes the key reasons why the Fibonacci sequence works extremely well as the foundation for story point estimation on agile projects. The combination of exponential range and scalability along with continuous team discussion and improved visibility drives superior estimation.

Don't hesitate to comment below with any other questions!

Summary of Main Benefits

  • Fibonacci sequence uses exponential growth mapping to estimate variability

  • Typical scales used range from 0, 1, 2, 3 to 100 story points 

  • Abstract story points quantify effort and complexity, not time

  • Planning poker estimation fosters unshared assumption identification

  • Historical velocity in completed story points enables better forecasting

  • Exponential gaps provide high resolution at both estimation extremes

  • Expanded scales add precision with 0.5, 100 story points etc.

  • Increased visibility into subtleties of each story

  • Improved collaboration, trust and shared buy-in 

Mastering Agile Estimation with the Fibonacci Sequence for Superior Story Points

Using the Fibonacci sequence to assign story points during agile estimation leads to more accurate sizing of user stories. This article explains how and why the Fibonacci scale works so well for agile teams to estimate their work.

What is the Fibonacci Sequence and How is it Used in Agile Estimation?

The Fibonacci sequence is a series of numbers where each number is the sum of the previous two numbers, starting with 0 and 1. This creates the exponential number sequence: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55 etc.

In agile estimation, a modified version of the Fibonacci sequence is commonly used to size user stories and estimate the relative effort required to complete them. Typical modified Fibonacci scales used include 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 20, 40 and 100.

Using a Fibonacci scale provides several key benefits for agile estimation:

  • It accounts for the exponential increase in difficulty and effort associated with larger and more complex user stories

  • The gaps between the Fibonacci numbers get wider as the numbers increase, reflecting the greater uncertainty inherent in larger estimates

  • The relative sizing feels more natural and intuitive for agile teams estimating story points

Overall, the modified Fibonacci scale maps closely to the typical variability seen in agile story point estimation, with small enhancements clustered nearer the bottom and larger efforts towards the top.

Why Use Story Points Instead of Hours for Agile Estimation?

Story points represent the overall effort and complexity required to complete a user story. They purposefully remain an abstract unit instead of estimating in hours. This allows agile teams to estimate stories relative to each other without getting bogged down in detailed hour estimate predictions.

Some of the main benefits of using story points over hours for estimation include:

  • Not coupling estimates directly to hours makes them more accurate across varying team velocities and sprint durations

  • Story points better incorporate unknowns, unplanned work and complexity

  • Less prone to unintended padding or sandbagging of hour estimates

  • Focuses the team on story prioritization over false precision

By capturing the overall effort needed to complete each story, story points lead to better release planning and forecasting by agile teams. Detailed task hour estimation is still done later in the sprint planning process.

How Are Story Points Estimated Using the Fibonacci Scale?

During sprint planning, agile teams play planning poker to estimate story points. Each team member selects a number from the Fibonacci scale that reflects their assessment of the overall effort and complexity needed to complete the user story or product backlog item being discussed.

Once everyone has made their selection based on the relative sizing and risk, all team member selections are revealed at the same time. Any differences in the story point assessments are then discussed to understand the rationale and characteristics missed by some team members.

Through this estimation process and discussion, a final story point value is agreed upon for the story utilizing team consensus. If a story is too broad or complex to complete in a single sprint, the agile team will further break it down into smaller, more manageable pieces with individual estimates.

What Does Each Story Point Number Represent?

While the specific meaning of each Fibonacci story point number differs somewhat between agile teams and projects, some general principles and guidelines do apply:

  • 1 to 3 points usually signifies a small user story that is an enhancement type of change, bug fix or otherwise represents relatively low effort

  • 5 points is generally used for an isolated user story of moderate scope that delivers value for the customer

  • 8 points represents a more significant feature or structural change spanning various parts of the product that has some inherent complexity, risk factors or dependencies

  • 13+ points are typically used for very large user stories where the effort is expected to span an entire sprint or longer, involves significant unknowns or touches multiple interconnected parts of the system

As the story point number and corresponding spot on the Fibonacci scale increases, it signals progressively increasing effort, uncertainty and overall risk associated with the completion of that story. This helps inform estimation and planning.

How Is Velocity Tracked with Story Points to Improve Planning?

A key agile estimation practice is tracking the number of story points the team completes within each sprint through the working software delivered. This determines their velocity or work capacity which is used to forecast how much the team can likely deliver in future sprints.

Velocity needs to be measured over multiple sprints for it to provide reliable predictive insights. Since it will depend greatly on the size, experience, tools and evolving skills of specific agile teams, velocity should be tracked separately for each team. Comparing velocity across teams is less meaningful than observing velocity trends over time for a given team.

By tracking story point velocity trends over multiple iterations, agile estimation and planning activities improve greatly along with more predictable forecasting of upcoming work.

How Does Using Story Points Foster Better Planning and Prioritization?

The process of assigning story points using the Fibonacci scale requires engaged discussion, questions and clarifications so that the agile team builds shared understanding. Every team member provides their estimate so unshared assumptions, unknown gaps or blindspots in understanding are revealed.

Discussing each user story or product backlog item in detail fosters better appreciation of its size, complexity, associated risk, dependencies with other parts of the system, and overall business value. This builds collective knowledge and understanding throughout the team.

With clearer comprehension of key story details, the efficiency and accuracy of release planning and sprint planning is enhanced dramatically. In a similar way, story point estimation aids continuous product backlog grooming and prioritization.

What is a Typical Agile Estimation Process Using Story Points?

While variations certainly exist across teams and frameworks like Scrum or Kanban, here is a typical high-level flow for leveraging story points and the Fibonacci scale in agile estimation:

  • Backlog Grooming: The product owner clarifies, elaborates and decomposes stories in preparation for the backlog estimation. Acceptance criteria is defined.

  • Estimation & Planning: The full development team plays planning poker to size each story and agree on story point assessments via team consensus. 

  • Velocity Tracking: Team velocity based on completed story points is tracked over multiple sprints to forecast team capability.

  • Ongoing Backlog Refinement: Agile estimation is an ongoing process, with new stories continuously refined and points updated based on evolving understanding.

How Does the Fibonacci Scale Improve Estimation Ranges?

The Fibonacci sequence exhibits exponential growth by design with each number being the sum of the previous two. This means that the gaps between the numbers increase exponentially as you move up the scale from smaller to larger numbers.

These exponentially expanding differences between the Fibonacci numbers provide a lot more latitude for larger estimates where greater variability naturally exists. Compare finding 7 different estimate options between a linear range of 1-10 versus the wider variability of an exponential range from 1-100.

This exponential range is far easier and more practical for distinguishing between finely-grained differences in small estimates while still providing wide estimate bands for larger efforts. This works very well for accurately capturing the nature of agile estimation variability.

When Would a Team Use a Modified Fibonacci Scale?

For some agile teams, extending the standard Fibonacci scale used for story point estimation makes sense for their projects or context.

As an example, including additional granularity with 0.5 as the first number after 0, allows more precision in sizing effort for very small enhancements and bug fixes.

At the other end of the spectrum, expanding the scale to 100 points helps capture some of the exceptionally large epics that arise despite attempts to decompose stories into sprint-size vertical slices of functionality.

Using a modified Fibonacci scale like: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 20, 40, 100 retains all the exponential benefits while improving range coverage at both ends of the estimation spectrum.

What are the Key Benefits of Using Fibonacci in Agile Estimation?

Here are some of the significant benefits and capability improvements that agile teams realize from incorporating a Fibonacci scale for story point estimation:

  • More Accurate Relative Sizing: The expanding gaps provide more precision where variability is lower while still accommodating uncertainty in larger items. Exponential range matches reality.

  • Reflects Increasing Complexity: Larger stories often involve more integration surfaces, technical unknowns, infrastructure needs etc. which increase complexity disproportionately. 

  • Encourages Discussion and Shared Understanding: Having to explain why you chose 13 vs. 8 or why you think it's a 3 forces important debate and awareness of subtle differences between stories.

  • Improves Release Forecasting: The historical velocity tracking (completed story points per sprint) feeds continuous release planning improvements as predictive ability increases sprint-over-sprint.

  • Shared Buy-In and Collaboration: Estimation builds connections between team members as everyone provides their perspective. Planning poker also helps eliminate groupthink based on hierarchy since reveal is simultaneous.

That summarizes the key reasons why the Fibonacci sequence works extremely well as the foundation for story point estimation on agile projects. The combination of exponential range and scalability along with continuous team discussion and improved visibility drives superior estimation.

Don't hesitate to comment below with any other questions!

Summary of Main Benefits

  • Fibonacci sequence uses exponential growth mapping to estimate variability

  • Typical scales used range from 0, 1, 2, 3 to 100 story points 

  • Abstract story points quantify effort and complexity, not time

  • Planning poker estimation fosters unshared assumption identification

  • Historical velocity in completed story points enables better forecasting

  • Exponential gaps provide high resolution at both estimation extremes

  • Expanded scales add precision with 0.5, 100 story points etc.

  • Increased visibility into subtleties of each story

  • Improved collaboration, trust and shared buy-in